H
P1P1
shedletsky
Timothée Simonot’s Twisted Color Pie Cube Draft · ranked window complete · final results
2 ranked players built from the same opening packs, measured against 8 fixed benchmark decks. Historical entries remain playable but cannot change these results.
Submitted player decks
| Player rank | Player | First pick | Colors | Rating | Record (W–L–D) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 of 2 | shedletsky | Hypnotic Specter | B · R | 1669 | 98–61–1 | Too few players for percentiles |
| #2 of 2 | 98kid | Nezumi Shortfang | W · U · B · G | 1629 | 91–69–0 | Too few players for percentiles |
Pack 1 · Pick 1
H
P1P1
shedletsky
N
P1P1
98kid
Decklists, picks, and match stories
shedletsky
Snapshot: Hypnotic Specter
P1P1: Hypnotic Specter
View deck98kid
Snapshot: Fauna Shaman
P1P1: Nezumi Shortfang
View deck2 submitted drafts · choices, not proof of quality
What the field became
Color lanes: B · R 50% · W · U · B · G 50%
The same for every player
Every player faces these exact same 8 benchmark decks. Open any list to see the full build used for comparison.
Seat 0 benchmark · W · U · R
Mirror Drafter · same seat, same packsEfficient creatures, premium interaction, and a disciplined curve.
Seat 2 · B · R · G
Efficient creatures, premium interaction, and a disciplined curve.
Seat 3 · U · B · R
Values recursion, sacrifice, discard, and graveyard resources.
Seat 4 · W · U · B · G
Gives bombs and high-rarity cards a little extra benefit of the doubt.
Seat 5 · W · U · B
Presses the curve with cheap creatures, tricks, and reach.
Seat 6 · W · U · B · R
Accepts modest standalone cards when they strengthen a coherent engine.
Seat 7 · U · B · G
Looks for enchantments, auras, and enchantment payoffs.
Seat 8 · U · B · R
Builds wide boards and favors cards that multiply creatures.
Ranked players + benchmark decks
Player rank compares people with people. Overall rank below also shows where every player build sits among the fixed benchmark decks.
| Overall | Player or benchmark deck | Type | Rating | Record (W–L–D) | Player rank | Games · likely range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Elowen | Benchmark deck | 1729 | 49–31–0 | Benchmark deck | 80 games · 1650–1804 · rank 1–4 |
| #2 | Tavi | Benchmark deck | 1714 | 47–32–1 | Benchmark deck | 80 games · 1635–1783 · rank 1–5 |
| #3 | Ada | Benchmark deck | 1675 | 43–37–0 | Benchmark deck | 80 games · 1601–1745 · rank 1–6 |
| #4 | shedletsky | Player deck | 1669 | 215–144–1 | #1 · Too few players for percentiles | 360 games · 1624–1710 · rank 2–5 |
| #5 | 98kid | Player deck | 1629 | 195–165–0 | #2 · Too few players for percentiles | 360 games · 1591–1666 · rank 3–7 |
| #6 | Rook | Benchmark deck | 1595 | 34–46–0 | Benchmark deck | 80 games · 1531–1667 · rank 4–8 |
| #7 | Mirror DrafterMirror Drafter · same seat, same packs | Direct rival | 1584 | 33–47–0 | Mirror Drafter | 80 games · 1517–1656 · rank 4–8 |
| #8 | Lux | Benchmark deck | 1499 | 24–56–0 | Benchmark deck | 80 games · 1433–1581 · rank 7–10 |
| #9 | Jori | Benchmark deck | 1455 | 20–60–0 | Benchmark deck | 80 games · 1383–1527 · rank 8–10 |
| #10 | Nema | Benchmark deck | 1443 | 19–61–0 | Benchmark deck | 80 games · 1352–1530 · rank 8–10 |