Three-Body Problem · ranked window complete · final results

Three-Body Problem Draft — November 9, 2026

4 ranked players built from the same opening packs, measured against 3 fixed benchmark decks. Historical entries remain playable but cannot change these results.

Submitted player decks

Final player leaderboard

Frozen when the ranking window closed.
Player rankPlayerFirst pickColorsRatingRecord (W–L–D)Status
#1 of 4 maurice Gravblade Heavy W · B1748106–56–0Too few players for percentiles
#2 of 4 shedletsky Banishing Light W · B1747106–56–0Too few players for percentiles
#3 of 4 .ghostlight Banishing Light W · G150659–103–0Too few players for percentiles
#4 of 4 sebash2229 Eusocial Engineering B · R · G135339–123–0Too few players for percentiles

Pack 1 · Pick 1

The P1P1 wall

Same opening packs. Different first instincts.

Decklists, picks, and match stories

Explore public player builds

4 submitted drafts · choices, not proof of quality

Player picks and cards

Public ranked entries only · frozen at close

First-pick choices

  1. Banishing Light2 players · 50% 50%
  2. Eusocial Engineering1 player · 25% 25%
  3. Gravblade Heavy1 player · 25% 25%

Most drafted

  1. Luxknight Breacher4 players · 10 copies100%
  2. Gravblade Heavy4 players · 9 copies100%
  3. Meltstrider's Gear4 players · 6 copies100%
  4. Comet Crawler4 players · 4 copies100%
  5. Scout for Survivors4 players · 4 copies100%
  6. Virulent Silencer4 players · 4 copies100%

Most played

  1. Luxknight Breacher3 decks · 8 copies75%
  2. Gravblade Heavy3 decks · 5 copies75%
  3. Gravpack Monoist3 decks · 3 copies75%
  4. Auxiliary Boosters3 decks · 3 copies75%
  5. Emergency Eject3 decks · 3 copies75%
  6. Dawnstrike Vanguard3 decks · 3 copies75%

What the field became

Main deck types

Broad shells inferred from colors, creature count, and curve.
B/R/G Midrange1 deck25%
W/B Midrange1 deck25%
W/B Ramp1 deck25%
W/G Midrange1 deck25%

Color lanes: W · B 50% · B · R · G 25% · W · G 25%

The same for every player

The 3 benchmark decks

Every player faces these exact same 3 benchmark decks. Open any list to see the full build used for comparison.

Seat 0 benchmark · U · G

Mirror Drafter · same seat, same packs

Mirror Drafter

The Fundamentalist

Efficient creatures, premium interaction, and a disciplined curve.

40-card decklist

Seat 2 · W · R

Lux

The Treasure Hunter

Gives bombs and high-rarity cards a little extra benefit of the doubt.

40-card decklist

Seat 3 · W · U · B · R · G

Mira

The Navigator

Reads the cards still flowing and changes colors more readily.

40-card decklist

Ranked players + benchmark decks

Final all-deck ranking

Unranked historical replays are excluded.

Player rank compares people with people. Overall rank below also shows where every player build sits among the fixed benchmark decks.

OverallPlayer or benchmark deckTypeRatingRecord (W–L–D)Player rankGames · likely range
#1 maurice Player deck 1748176–79–0#1 · Too few players for percentiles255 games · 1693–1798 · rank 1–3
#2 shedletsky Player deck 1747163–77–0#2 · Too few players for percentiles240 games · 1693–1791 · rank 1–3
#3 Lux Benchmark deck 1720140–76–0Benchmark deck216 games · 1667–1777 · rank 1–4
#4 Mira Benchmark deck 1644122–94–0Benchmark deck216 games · 1590–1688 · rank 3–4
#5 .ghostlight Player deck 150694–159–0#3 · Too few players for percentiles253 games · 1465–1556 · rank 5–6
#6 Mirror DrafterMirror Drafter · same seat, same packs Direct rival 146076–140–0Mirror Drafter216 games · 1414–1526 · rank 5–6
#7 sebash2229 Player deck 135352–198–0#4 · Too few players for percentiles250 games · 1306–1408 · rank 7–7